TV Review: What went wrong with Almost Human?
Before the 2013-2014 season began, there was
a lot of buzz about Almost Human. Not only was it coming out of the fairly
successful Bad Robot stable, with one of the producers of Fringe on board, but it had overtones of the classic Robot novels
by science fiction grandmaster Isaac Asimov.
Add to that a fairly well-regarded cast, especially the two leads (Karl
Urban, Michael Ealy), and there was a lot of reason to think that the show was
a sure thing.
So what went wrong? Why is Almost
Human on the verge of cancellation, and why was the first season so
tragically mediocre?
It’s hard not to point to FOX and wonder if
they all but destroyed the show’s ability to gain a following. Shall we enumerate the sins of the
much-reviled network? First, putting a
genre show into a mid-season slot puts a bad taste in a lot of people’s mouths;
it suggests that the show needs more work before it’s ready to hit the
airwaves. Rumblings about changes to the
production staff behind the scenes, including a push for the series to adopt a
more episodic, procedural direction vs. a serialized piece, added fuel to the
rumor fire.
Then the show aired, and some problems were
immediately apparent. The pilot itself
was full of exposition, not a small amount of which set up some apparent
ongoing plot elements. The very next
episode to air, on the premiere night, wasn’t even the next episode in the
production order. It had almost nothing
to do with following up on the plot threads from the pilot, and also seemed to
be designed to capitalize on the “sex sells” portion of the audience.
Running episodes out of order was a common
drawback, and reminded genre fans of similar circumstances with shows like Firefly, Dollhouse, and Wonderfalls. This decision, almost certainly mandated by
the FOX network, became ever more inexplicable over the course of the
season. Episodes produced early in the
run, but aired late in the season, were clearly intended to focus on characters
within the ensemble and introduce specific details about them.
One particularly bad example concerned Lt.
Stahl. For much of the season, Stahl was
most notable for being fairly bland, with little personality or rapport with
those around her. Various hints to attraction
between Stahl and Kennix were wildly inconsistent and seemingly out of
order. More than halfway through the
season, however, it was revealed that Stahl was a “chrome”, a genetically
engineered human that was designed to be perfect. Her apparent blandness was an in-universe
commentary on what eugenics might produce: a somewhat empty version of “perfection”.
Had that episode aired as per the intended
production order, very early in the season, Minka Kelly’s performance would
have made a lot more sense. Indeed, once
her true nature was revealed, it tied into the show’s theme incredibly
well. Instead, because of the decision
to air episodes out of order, the actress seemed to have no idea what she was
doing, and the writers seemed inconsistent with her character portrayal. With no overt communication that the episodes
were out of order, it’s little wonder that genre fans felt like the show couldn’t
get out of its own way.
There also seemed to be a conflict, over the
course of the season, between the stated premise of the show in the opening
credits (delivered via one of the worst voiceovers in recent memory) and the
actual product. The premise was simple:
technology had outstripped society’s ability to control it, so law enforcement
had to step up its game with robotic officers.
The implication is a step beyond the scientific nightmares of Fringe; instead, beyond a few occasionally
hints of a world where entire sections were no longer considered inhabitable,
the incidents seemed somewhat isolated.
And that’s a shame, considering that some of
the best moments of the season provided the audience with a look at how much of
a police state society had become, and how the cities were essentially a façade
of civilization. Too often, the show was
reduced to a futuristic buddy-cop procedural, with every episode wrapping up
neatly at the end. If that had been how
the show was presented, it would have probably been more accepted as such. If anything, those hints of something bigger
and better in the background kept reminding the audience of the show they could
have been watching.
That’s not to say that all the blame falls on
the network; the writers ultimately failed to end the season on a strong
note. The final three episodes produced
were also the final three episodes to air, and yet there was no attempt to
build to a strong finale. The elements
introduced in the pilot were barely even mentioned! Perhaps worse, the finale included a subplot
in which Dorian was under evaluation to decide if he should continue to work
for the police department. This might
have been more suspenseful if the question had been raised in previous
episodes, or if the episodes leading into the finale had raised doubt in Dorian’s
future. Instead, the outcome felt like a
foregone conclusion.
The one saving grace for Almost Human is that FOX is trying to develop a year-round schedule
of fresh content. Airing in the fall or
the traditional winter/spring mid-season period is no longer an absolute
rule. High profile programming like the
return of 24 is coming right after
the May sweeps period, when most shows air their finales. So it’s very possible that FOX might bring Almost Human back for a second season,
if only to keep the year-round schedule a viable concept.
If it does return, one can only hope that the writers are given a chance to break out of the suffocating mold of the procedural underpinnings, and that the intended flow of the season is respected. Adding an ongoing thread to a second season, not unlike the first couple seasons of Fringe, would be one way to help the series escape its currently average standing.
- Strong cast
- Intriguing premise
- Proven production pedigree
- Procedural elements get too much focus
- FOX aired episodes out of order
- Season failed to build to strong finale
pkjr92
CONCURRING OPINION